The Philadelphia Artwork Museum (PAM) is claiming in a court docket petition filed on 20 November that Sasha Suda, the director and chief government fired by the museum’s board earlier this month, had “misappropriated funds from the museum and lied to cowl up her theft”. The petition was filed in response to Suda’s lawsuit towards the museum on 10 November, through which she alleged “breaches of contract, unhealthy religion, unfair therapy and abuse”, and requested a jury trial, damages and two years’ severance pay. The Philadelphia Inquirer first reported information of the museum’s petition.
In an announcement shared with The Artwork Newspaper, a spokesperson for the museum mentioned: “The Philadelphia Artwork Museum has filed a petition to compel arbitration and keep judicial proceedings in response to the claims made by Sasha Suda. We’ve got no additional remark at the moment.”
The museum’s petition claims that Suda, who was three years right into a five-year contract when she was fired, had repeatedly requested will increase in pay from the compensation committee of the museum’s board of trustees. When the committee refused, the petition claims, “Suda took the cash anyway, defying the board and violating her contract”. The petition doesn’t specify the sums that Suda allegedly misappropriated; her beginning base wage in 2022 was $720,000.
In her lawsuit, Suda claimed that she had obtained a 3% cost-of-living improve to her wage that was in keeping with the contract negotiated with the museum staff’ union in 2022. However she alleged that the museum’s board chair Ellen Caplan had “fabricated a false narrative round Suda’s compensation” as a pretext to conduct a “forensic investigation” of her compensation and bills, and, in the end a second vote-of-confidence through which the board’s government committee elected to fireplace her.
“The museum’s accusations are false,” Luke Nikas, a lawyer with the agency Quinn Emanuel who’s representing Suda, instructed The Artwork Newspaper in an announcement. “These are the identical recycled allegations from the sham investigation that the museum manufactured as a pretext for Suda’s wrongful termination.”
The museum’s petition requires Suda’s allegations to be handled via arbitration, asserting that neither her “meritless breach of contract declare, nor her delusional allegations of victimhood and persecution” need to be heard in court docket.
“The movement, in addition to its false narrative, matches the [PAM]’s longstanding sample of attempting to cowl up its misconduct and mistreatment of workers,” Nikas mentioned. “We anticipated the museum would like to cover the sordid particulars about its illegal therapy of Sasha Suda in a confidential arbitration. If the museum had nothing to cover, it might not be afraid to litigate in state court docket the place we filed the case.”
The day after it filed its petition accusing Suda of theft, the PAM appointed the previous Metropolitan Museum of Artwork director and chief government Daniel Weiss to exchange her. In her lawsuit, Suda claims that Weiss—who beforehand served as a governance guide to the museum—had instructed her of the PAM’s management: “It’s a very dysfunctional board.”
